Certain Doubt

Nothing is certain in life except doubt

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Book Reviews
  • Personal Plea
  • Statement of Purpose

Archive for the ‘media’ Category

Why Newt Gingrich Will Never Be President

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Newt Gingrich will never be president of the United States.

My reasoning is simple:

1 Newt Gingrich is too intelligent to be president.
Republicans voters don’t trust Presidents that talk down to them or who come off as acting smarter than they are. Evidence? George W. Bush. In order to get elected he had to drop his rich elitist cloak and don the mantle of the “good ole boy” Texan. As a University professor who loves peppering his speeches with adverbs, Newt simply can’t dumb down his rhetoric enough to appeal to dumb and intellectually insecure voters.

2 Newt Gingrich is too unlikeable to be president.
The last time Newt got close to being president (as Speaker of the house) he pissed off so many people that even his own caucus voted to remove him. Again, republican voters seem to favor candidates like “W” who look like a guy they’d like to sit down and have a beer with. If you went out drinking with Newt he could probably quote you chapter and verse about how the bar should fire the janitor and hire some poor black kid so he could learn the “value of hard work.” But ask him about baseball or NASCAR and you’ll probably get a blank stare. The sad fact is, nobody likes Newt.

3 Newt Gingrich has too much baggage.
Two divorces – the second one while he was having an affair with his current wife – house censure for ethics violations, tax evasion charges. After a while even the most dyed-in-the-wool fiscal hawk has to admit, Newt has an image problem when it comes to honesty and trustworthiness. And while he may not admit to a drinking problem – like W did – he also doesn’t have enough money or media connections to make his baggage go away. Again, for the “values voters” things like marital fidelity matter.

4 Newt Gingrich is short.
It is an axiom among presidential campaigns that the taller of the two candidates usually wins. This is not always true but in this day and age of media blitzes and presidential photo ops, it’s harder and harder to make up for one’s, shall we say, shortcomings? Newt’s website lists him at 6′-0″. I don’t believe it. Compared with either Barrack Obama or Mitt Romney, he looks like a short, pudgy white guy who could really use some of John Boehner’s Quick Tanning Lotion. I think the only way Newt can overcome being height challenged is if he saws about six inches off of Romney’s legs.

5 Newt Gingrich doesn’t want to be president.
From the early fiasco of taking a cruise while the other contenders were out knocking on doors, to his continuing reliance on book signings to keep him in the public eye, Newt appears as a man who would rather continue giving lectures at 80,000$ a pop and raking in money as a high paid lobbyist and corporate shill than be President. I mean really, can you conceive of a Commander in Chief who puts meetings with Putin and Merkel on hold because he’s got a date at Barnes and Nobel? What’s he going to do when there’s rioting in the streets because people can’t even find work as school janitors… give a lecture at Watsa-Motta-U.?

Conclusion:
I can hear some of you out there whining: “If he’s not serious about running, why is are republicans giving him so much credence?” I have a theory about this. When it comes to defeating Barrack Obama republicans know they have an image problem. They are running against an established incumbent who was swept into office on a tide of popularity. While that popularity has waned some, in close elections, the incumbent almost always gets the nod. Thus the only thing they can do is present a bunch of wacko candidates who say wacko things, keep the republican meme of “don’t tax the for job creators” and position themselves so that when the “reasonable” one in the field emerges on top – Mitt Romney – all the republicans can breathe a sigh of relief and say “at least we didn’t get [fill in the blank]. So all Newt really is, is the latest Cain/Bachmann/Santorum/Perry: a stalking horse who will say outrageous things to keep people tune in to the “debates.”

It’s classic slight of hand. Listen to Newt try to reason that child labor laws are actually bad for poor kids. All the while, the corporatists in the House and Senate pass bill after bill designed to rip off the tax payer by reducing corporate taxes and regulations and passing the cost off onto you and me.
Trust me on this one. Come the election next year, Newt will be a distant memory.

Tags: 9gag, Certain Doubt, election, Gingrich, newt, Newt Gingrich, Obama, poltics, president, reddit, republican, Thomas Vincent, Vincent
Posted in Daily Rant, Ethics, Politics, government, media | No Comments »

Occupy The Rich

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

Today something happened I never would have expected. I found myself agreeing with Steve Forbes.

In an interview today the billionaire and one time presidential candidate intimated that the Occupy Wall street protestors were protesting in the wrong place.

I couldn’t agree more.

Of course Steve - “Mr. Flat Tax” – Forbes ruined it by going on to say the place protestors should be is the Halls of Congress… ostensibly to convince law makers to remove the few rules and regulations that allow him and his cronies to amass huge fortunes on the backs of hard working middle class workers.

Though I empathize and support the “Occupy Movement,” I’m also in agreement with those who think most of the protests are symbolic, undirected, and largely ineffectual, in part because they are “occupying” the wrong place. If the 99% really wants to affect change, they should take their protest to those truly responsible for their misery.

In other words, they should camp out on Steve Forbes’ lawn.

Plopping yourself down in the middle of Wall Street and chaining yourself to a lamp post might make you feel revolutionarily righteous. But it’s not going to do squat about changing the fundamental reasons you are homeless, jobless, and without healthcare. Why?

The 1% don’t care about you.

Why should they? They don’t even see you. At best you are an annoyance, like a wad of gum stuck to their shoe. You can keep marching in the streets all you want. You can join hands and wail about injustice till you’re blue in the face. It’s not going to do a thing to get assholes like Steve Forbes out of their plush country club comfort zones.

But if we start showing up on their lawns, if we can paint a color picture for the media of the disparity of wealth between young unemployed black men and white, entitled, Trust fund babies like Forbes, then and only then will we start to make them take notice and possibly change their behavior.

84 year old Dorli Rainey of Seattle got her 15 minutes of fame – in the form of an apology from the mayor and an interview with Keith Olbermann – when she was pepper-sprayed at a Seattle street protest. But imagine how much more effective that incident would have been if she had been sprayed on the grounds of the Koch brother’s Estate?

The sad picture of Ms. Rainey dripping with peppery goo that went viral was an effective symbol of police brutality and excess. But I can’t help but think the protest against Karl Rove – who was heckled recently at a speech he tried to give at the University of Virginia – was much more efficacious.

In my opinion, this is the direction the occupy movement should take. If you are suffering because of inequality and injustice, rather than meaningless confrontations with urban police in riot gear, why not take the protest to those who are responsible for your misery. Instead of protesting Bank of America at one of their branch offices, why not take the fight directly to the fat cats who own Bank of America?

The Koch Brothers made news with their secretive database of millionaires whom they can tap for campaign cash in 2012.

Why don’t we make our own database. A list of billionaires whom we can hound by showing up on their doorsteps till they stop acting like Oligarchic Emperors, till they quit hoarding all the money, and till they quit using their piles of cash to subvert the electoral will of the people?

The 1% need computers to compile their database. Ours can be more low tech. All we need to do is look for the mansions and country clubs.

By the Way, Make sure to check out Firedoglake’s effort to get warm clothes to occupiers: go to: https://donate.firedoglake.com/weatherize/contribute

Tags: 1%, 99%, 9gag, billionaires, economics, Forbes, inequality, occupy, protest, reddit, Thomas Vincent, Vincent, wall street
Posted in Daily Rant, Ethics, Politics, economics, government, humor, media | No Comments »

Declaration of Independence… From Corporations

Friday, October 14th, 2011

In honor of the Occupy Wall Street Movement, I have composed the following updated version of our Declaration of Independence.

IN CONGRESS, October 14, 2011

The Unanimous Declaration of the 99% of the Population
of The United States of America.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to re-examine economic systems which have connected them with one another, it is only natural that should those systems fail to serve them with fairness and justice, the People would have just cause to rise up and demand change.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all humans, by virtue of their birth are due certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness; that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Citizens, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any Form of Government or Economic system becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, or economic system laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to produce fairness and justice for all. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Economies long established should not be changed for light and transient causes. But when a long train of abuses and injustices evinces a design to reduce them under absolute oligarchy, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such tyranny and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of the People; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to rise up against their former economic system. In specific, the history of Corporations is replete with repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute oligarchy, the purpose being to subjugate the People by concentrating all wealth in the hands of a few. By placing the pursuit of profit and the accumulation of capital over the welfare of the people, Corporations have demonstrated their gross unsuitability as institutions that serve the public good. To prove this, let the following facts be submitted to a candid world.

Corporations have fought against the right of workers to form free and open unions and to bargain for better pay and safer working conditions.

They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one’s skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.

Corporations have repeatedly closed factories and shipped jobs overseas. They have caused untold hardship to thousands of unemployed workers in the form of lay-offs, reduced pensions, and lost health benefits.

Corporations have corrupted the electoral process, contributing large sums of money to legislators who will put the interests of corporations and the super wealthy over the needs of the people.
Corporations have repeatedly avoided paying their fair share of taxes by re-locating their headquarters in offshore tax havens, this despite gargantuan federal budget shortfalls.

Corporations have sought and continue to receive billions of dollars in tax payer money to bail them out for risky and speculative investments that failed, even while Corporate executives continue to receive millions of dollars in bonuses.
In a time of mass unemployment, lowered standards of living and reduced benefits, Corporations have raised the compensation for CEO’s till the average executive salary is 263 times that of the average worker.

Corporations have polluted the planet with impunity. They have repeatedly ignored laws and regulations meant to reign in the worst of their abuses. They have even written and pushed through legislation designed to water down and weaken existing environmental laws.

Corporations have routinely passed off the cost of cleanup for industrial pollution on the public taxpayer.

Corporations are leaders in denying the increasingly evident effects of climate change.

Corporate banks have illegally foreclosed on homes , despite not having the original mortgage.

Pharmaceutical Corporations have refused to research, develop and manufacture necessary drugs that could improve the health of the population because there wasn’t enough profit in it.

Corporations have sought to privatize, comodify, and limit access to the most basic services currently provided by government. They have worked to dismantle social programs, such as education, and health care, that should be the right of every citizen in a civilized society.

Corporations have fought to limit open competition and free markets through monopolistic practices such as consolidations and leveraged buy outs.

Corporations have sought to control public opinion and stifle dissent, through the monopolization and control of the media by a few large multinational companies.

Corporations have presided over the most lopsided and unfair distribution of wealth in our nation’s history. They have used this growing wealth imbalance to further influence government and tilt the board in their favor.

Corporations have sought to escape responsibility for malfeasance by influencing the courts to place limits on the amount of damages due to the public for corporate negligence.

Corporations have encouraged the government to engage in endless wars and military occupations. They continue to profit from the manufacture of billions of dollars of useless weapons of war despite a massive budget shortfall and a crushing national debt. Corporate war profiteers have stolen money that could have been used to improve the lives of the People by investment in domestic infrastructure, and fully funding public education and health care programs.

In every stage of these oppressions we, the People, have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated petitions to our government have been answered only by repeated injury, police harassment, and imprisonment. Any institution who places profit and the private accumulation of capital above all, who’s every action is marked by the stain of greed, corruption, and injustice, must not be allowed to continue to compromise the welfare of the People.

Therefore, as representatives of the 99%, we do solemnly publish and declare our right to be free from corporate tyranny and to be absolved of all allegiance to laws designed to maintain that tyranny; that until such time as our elected leaders reign in and enforce regulations to curb the worst avaricious acts of Corporations, we assert our right to join together and occupy public spaces until our grievances are heard.

United we stand in our opposition to the runaway greed and lust for power that causes large multinational corporations to try and subjugate the People, to deny them justice and equality, and to subvert and undermine our democratic system of government. The continued health and welfare of the People is more important than maintain corporate profits.

Tags: 99%, blog, certaindoubt, corporations, declaration, economics, Independence, occupy, occupy everywhere, occupy wall street, Politics, reddit, Thomas Vincent, Vincent
Posted in Daily Rant, Politics, economics, government, law, media | No Comments »

Problems

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

If there are two themes that have been central to my adult life, the first has to be that in order to come to any meaningful solution to a problem, one must first correctly identify the problem.

The second is that once correctly identified, most problems are really not all that difficult.

Regardless of how intractable and tough a quandary may seem, when you strip off all the non-essentials, when you lose the emotional baggage you bring to a problem, peel away the layers of “woulda, shoulda, coulda,” the essential nature of most of life’s dilemmas is usually pretty simple. Often, I have found, the difficulty of correctly identifying a problem far exceeds the difficulty of coming up with a fix. Moreover, when identified, it is uncanny how often the “problem” turns out to be not a problem after all.

Need an example?

Take the problem of getting to the moon. On the surface this problem might seem to be daunting in its complexity, requiring among other things, a prodigious amount of mathematics, physics, and engineering. (To say nothing of a mountain of cash.) In short, getting to the moon, really is rocket science.

But take a step back for a minute and ask yourself: is the question of how to get to the moon really a problem that needs solving? In retrospect, I am not at all certain. To be sure, our few trips to the moon took a herculean effort and were a monumental scientific achievement. However, if we really face the facts, our moon shots, indeed our entire space program, was motivated principally by a desire to win the cold war “space race,” by reaching the moon ahead of the Soviet Union. Thus we spent millions of dollars of tax payer money and years of research in what amounted to a politico/galactic pissing match that netted us little more than some cool photos and a handful of exotic rocks. When one considers the other uses that money could have been used for, other problems that could have been solved – oh, say, developing solar energy, or building up our infrastructure, or even educating our population in math and science such that we didn’t have large numbers of ignorant nut jobs wandering around who are so gullible to believe that a project as big as a moon shot could be faked – it’s enough to make one weep.

Thus, while the problem of how to get to the moon is undeniably complex, if one truly asks oneself why the problem needs to be solved, one might decide it simply wasn’t worth the effort. The issue would be moot.

Need a domestic example? Most of the few problems my wife and I had with our son when he was a teenager had more to do with our preconceptions of what was right and proper than they did with anything he did. His actions were rarely unsafe, or harmful to others. If he decided to dye his hair green like he did one Halloween was that really the end of the world? Nope. The obscenity laden graffiti drawn on his wall with a sharpie? Annoying, but not really life and death. Ultimately, the problems I had with most of my son’s acting out had more to do with me than to do with him. Thus, they were not really problems at all. Or they were not battles that needed to be fought.

And speaking of unnecessary battles, our current militaristic foreign policy is a classic example of a whole slew of problems that seem insurmountable, yet when you step back, they are not really problems that need solving. We didn’t have to invade Afghanistan or Iraq. We don’t need to be occupying those countries. Like most wars of aggression, the argument can be made that our entire foreign policy is nothing short of one big global pissing match. It’s tragic to think of what we could be accomplishing with the trillions of dollars and needless blood we are spilling in an effort to convince the world we are still a super power.

The debt ceiling? Another issue that seems to get more insurmountable every day. But is it really a problem? The congress rubber stamped increases in the debt ceiling as a matter of course for presidents from Regan on to Bush. Yet, somehow, the “debate” over the debt ceiling has taken on an ominous tone as the “tea party” branch of the republican party is stonewalling to get what they want on budget cuts and no taxes for the wealthy. As many have noted, they are holding the country hostage over an issue that is so obviously a political ploy that even rank and file republicans are starting to become disgusted. In short, they are making a problem where none exists.

“It’s embarrassing,” said a stock broker acquaintance of mine today. “The countries around the world are looking at the debt ceiling argument and shaking their heads in disbelief.” President Obama is fond of the phrase: “America’s vital interests.” If the threat of defaulting on our debts is not harmful to the nation’s vital interests I don’t know what is.

The Tea Party, anti-tax crowd is so bad at identifying what the problems in this country are it’s difficult not to come to the conclusion that they are actively trying to create problems instead of trying to solve them. I know that Eric Cantor and the other right wingers in the House of Representatives want to see Obama gone in 2012, but I think they really need to take a step back and ask themselves if they aren’t creating more problems for the country – and even for their rich constituents – than anything that could possibly occur if they just left well enough alone.

If anyone doubts that the debt ceiling is a bogus issue just consider the following: Suppose Obama holds a news conference tomorrow and says, “I’ve decided to replace Joe Biden with Eric Cantor. And I’m seriously considering packing it in in 2012 and turning the reins over to the Tea baggers.” If you think the debt ceiling would stay an issue for more than 2 seconds after that, then I have a conspiracy you’ll be sure to find interesting.

It involves the cover-up of a faked moon landing.

Tags: Cantor, certaindoubt, debt ceiling, election, government, moon landing, Obama, Politics, problems, republican, tea party, Thomas Vincent, Vincent
Posted in Daily Rant, Ethics, Politics, economics, government, media | No Comments »

Arguing With Cats

Friday, July 15th, 2011

Well it happened again. I was talking with a friend the other day and she said something like: “I have to watch them (Limbaugh, Hannity, O’Reilly) so I know what the other side is thinking.”

I have heard this sentiment before from otherwise well-meaning liberals and progressives who are convinced that it is important to know “where they are coming from” before they can have a meaningful dialog with conservatives.

I believe this to be an error.

The moment you listen to Rush Limbaugh you have already lost the argument. The moment you start thinking in terms of giving the “other side” any kind of credit for having a valid position, you have conceded game set and match. Watching Fox News in order to win an argument with those who watch Fox news is like trying to argue with a roomful of cats. You can’t win. It is pointless to try.

Why?

Because the other side is not interested in meaningful dialog. They are not interested in being fair and balanced. They could care less about compromise. They are not interested in winning an argument with you. They view any exchange with you as a cage match knife fight and they have no intention of ceding that “you may have a valid point.” On anything.

Need an example?

Take the so called “birther” controversy. The whole notion that President Barrack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus not a legitimate president is ludicrous on its face. And while it may not have been started by mainstream republicans, the list of prominent political leaders – from Newt Gingrich to Sarah Palin – who jumped on this issue proves they are not interested in meaningful debate on what’s wrong with America and how to fix it. If they will hammer at the birther story, a crude attempt to win over converts by questioning the very origins of their opponent, and playing – not too subtly – on the predjudices and bigotry of the population, then it is obvious that they don’t care about fairness or logic or reason. They are only interested in winning.

Need further proof?

Consider the economy. On October 25, 2010 Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, (R-KY) in interview with the National Journal said:
“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

There it is. The most important item on the republican agenda, is not jobs, or war, or even balancing the budget. No, the number one priority is getting rid of Obama. When faced with this type of bald faced absolutist statement, what is there left to discuss? When your opponent won’t even start debating the issues until you leave the stage, what’s the point in trying to learn where they are coming from?

McConnell repeated this sentiment the other day. When speaking about the so called “negotiations” on the debt ceiling he said: “I have little question that as long as this president is in the Oval Office, a real solution is unattainable.”

These are not the words of someone who is interested in compromise. And anyone who parrots back incendiary language such as this is obviously not interested in compromise either. You don’t have to listen to Fox News analysis to understand where Mitch McConnell and the other republican leaders are coming from. They want Obama gone. Period. No discussion needed. It is useless to listen to the latest outrageous statement by Rush or Bill or any of the other talking heads. In their view, as long as Obama remains in office, there can be no discussion.

The main reason it is pointless to try and learn what the other side is thinking by listening to bloviators like Rush and company is that they are nothing more than tools. They are shills, hucksters, pitch-men. They are selling snake-oil from the back of a wagon. Listening to them in order to gain ammunition with which to do battle with your racist brother-in-law is like trying to figure out how to convince said brother-in-law Chevy trucks are no good by watching Chevy truck commercials.

The republican party is bankrupt of anything remotely resembling a plan for what to do to make the country better. Modern republicans are corrupt, and venal. Their “ideas” consist of warmed over Ayn Randianism that greed is good and that the wealthy deserve to amass as much wealth as they possibly can. And they hate anything that smacks of Government helping its citizens.

You can’t argue with this viewpoint. Understanding where they are coming from does you no good. You can’t win in a discussion because theirs is not a viewpoint so much as a belief system. Presenting evidence to support the validity of your viewpoint will not work against an evangelical zealot for free market capitalism. You will not win an argument against them and you will not be able to win an argument with anyone who listens to their Apostles.

Listening to right wing radio will not aid you in convincing anyone who listens to right wing radio that what they are hearing is bad. The mere fact that they are listening to Rush Limbaugh is proof they are not interested in debating you. They are already lost. You cannot save them.

Your only hope is to resist turning to the dark side yourself.

Tags: arguing with cats, birther, cats, certaindoubt, conservatives, Fox News, Hannity, Limbaugh, media, OReilly, Politics, republican party, republicans, Thomas Vincent, Vincent
Posted in Daily Rant, Politics, economics, government, media | No Comments »

<< Previous

  • Categories

    • Daily Doubt (48)
    • Daily Rant (47)
    • economics (39)
    • Ethics (53)
    • government (24)
    • humor (13)
    • law (20)
    • media (33)
    • Politics (91)
    • satire (5)
    • technology (3)
    • Uncategorized (31)
    • warfare (35)
  • Other Writings

    • Book Reviews
  • Blogroll

    • Antiwar.com
    • Aphelion Webzine
    • Daily Kos
    • Freaking News
    • imgur
    • Impermanent Media
    • Olympia Newswire
    • Photobucket
    • Real Change Newspaper
    • The Ethical Spectacle
    • The Real News
  • Networking Sites

    • Digg.com
    • Reddit
  • News Sites

    • Antiwar.com
    • Common Dreams
    • Freaking News
    • Olympia Newswire
    • Raw Story
    • Wikileaks
  • Archives

    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
  • Admin

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2012 - Certain Doubt | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

WordPress theme designed by web design