<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Certain Doubt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.certaindoubt.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net</link>
	<description>Nothing is certain in life except doubt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:57:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Check Your Glock at the Door by jm</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/check-your-glock-at-the-door/comment-page-1/#comment-49776</link>
		<dc:creator>jm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/check-your-glock-at-the-door/#comment-49776</guid>
		<description>It is naive to think this would be a safer world if YOU, or any other well meaning “crusader for the 
good of the people”, were able to outlaw guns. Criminals and crazies have a way of killing people. 
criminals and crazies were killing people long before there were guns. ( The world was a much more 
dangerous place before guns, when unstoppable bands could roam the countryside with swords raping 
and pillaging. ) Japan took Okinawa by military force and made it law that no okinawan shall possess a 
sword. Perhaps YOU or some other “crusader for the good of the people” could pass a law so that it would 
be illegal to possess a sword, for the safety of the masses of course. I’m sure that YOU and your “crusader” 
friends plan on government agencies and police departments still having guns. Will secret service or 
county officers go home with guns or will they be locked up at headquarters. Will police departments be 
bound by law to “be there on time to prevent harm to citizens” be it at the hands of criminals or crazies 
armed with bats or steak knives . . . or guns or swords. 
	This debate can get ridiculous. History shows a world as or more brutal before guns. history 
shows many cases of very bad things happening to a population disarmed by a government. A woman ( 
physically smaller person ) in America does not have to brutalized by a strong criminal or crazy. The reality 
is that there are two possibilities behind the reasoning of YOU and your crusader friends. 1 - you want to 
put your head in the sand and make the bad things stop. Good intentions - but unrealistic. I believe this is 
what drives Rep. McArthy. 
	After a hurricane and the bread and milk low or gone on the store shelves. In the middle of a five 
day blackout, my family was sitting on our front porch. A gang of 15 or so youths in there late teens and 
early twenties come walking down the road shining bright flashlights yelling “who’s there - are you OK?” It 
wasn’t comforting - it was intimidating &amp; meant to be so! Words were exchanged - you can’t appear weak &amp; 
intimidated like a potential victim at a time like this! My wife said that was scary, imagine there was a 
bigger problem than this. 
	I did have my legal .45 caliber pistol in my belt at the time, though nobody ever knew it. It never 
came out. It is my first and foremost responsibility to protect my family, home , &amp; self all the time. Not as an 
afterthought. Watch the news - there are people in this world who do horrific things. Not rarely, there is 
horror on the news every day. My legal AR-15 with legal 30 round magazines came out of lock-up for the 
duration of the blackout. After my wife said “that was scary” I told her “that is why we own this! Not for 
hunting or target shooting - situations like this! 
	I am an American citizen - I have the right  - in the bill of rights meant for the individual - to not 
only keep but to bear arms. I do not have to hope for a police car to arrive while my family is brutalized. 
There is no obligation to keep or bear arms, however those who do not, have no right to disarm those who 
do. It is not the purpose of a gun to slaughter innocent victims, however crazies &amp; criminals use it for such. 
Cars run people down, baseball bats smash peoples heads in, the same knife used to carve the turkey on 
thanksgiving can be used for ax-murder type slaughters - though it is not there true purpose. The gun may 
have more destructive power - but this is what gives it the ability to be used to protect the weak against the 
stronger or against superior numbers until the police do arrive. 
	Police can not be sued for not responding “in time”. Their duty is to investigate crimes, apprehend 
those responsible and and hold them so the courts can decide their punishment. YOU are responsible for 
your own protection. YOU can be as serious or aloof as YOU choose. YOU should scream for the police and 
courts to do a better job punishing the crazies and criminals - because THEY are the CRAZIES! In this world 
it is an easy case to be made that citizens who choose to protect themselves with firearms are the smart 
ones! Yet you try to portray these good family loving people as the crazies! That is insane and UN-
American!!! 
	Gun rights are being infringed, illegally, in this country. True, to hunt you do not need a 30 round 
magazine. The reality is that after the hurricane, or refinery terrorist attack and resulting fuel shortage 
stopping truck deliveries, or any breakdown of normal life, the criminals &amp; crazies, the strong who bully, all 
become predators. And yes, band together. And at that point police get very busy. (A normal holiday 
weekend will be enough to put you on “hold” when you dial 911!!!) At that point response times could be too 
long to be of any help at all. You are on your own, and at that point a 30 round magazine is desirable, 
comforting &amp; yes needed. However it is now illegal to purchase anything over a 10 round magazine. 
Because a crazy criminal may break the law. ILLEGAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!!!  This 
brings us to reason number 2. 
	People in the government feel it is to their advantage to take away the ability of the people to 
stage an armed resistance! This line of thinking is UN-American. Like it or not, this line of thinking is in 
direct contrast to what the second amendment is truly about!!! A government of the people, by the  
people, for the people, would find their strength in a strong armed citizenry!!! A government of the people, 
by the people, for the people, would not find the “militia” part of the second amendment threatening. 
Looters would have a tough time if armed neighbors came together on each block to prevent lawlessness! 
It could be like a “well regulated militia” to keep the law, or at least prevent atrocities, when the police are 
overwhelmed. It’s a far better scenario than a disarmed public at the mercy of predators. A strong 
government of the people, by the people, for the people, is comforted by an armed, patriotic, strong 
citizenry. If a government fears an armed population they are probably heading in a direction of feeling the 
need to be able to control a population while following an agenda the people do not like. Perhaps in a 
direction thats good for the people even though they don’t think so, or don’t know any better and wether 
they like it or not because they have no recourse and we have nothing to fear from a disarmed population 
anyway, and besides, it’s for their own good! Doesn’t sound like America! 
	It is your right to decide against bearing arms, though I find your decision foolish. Don’t think 
good people should be forced to give up their ability to protect their family because you have the delusion 
of making the world safer after a criminal commits a horrible act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is naive to think this would be a safer world if YOU, or any other well meaning “crusader for the<br />
good of the people”, were able to outlaw guns. Criminals and crazies have a way of killing people.<br />
criminals and crazies were killing people long before there were guns. ( The world was a much more<br />
dangerous place before guns, when unstoppable bands could roam the countryside with swords raping<br />
and pillaging. ) Japan took Okinawa by military force and made it law that no okinawan shall possess a<br />
sword. Perhaps YOU or some other “crusader for the good of the people” could pass a law so that it would<br />
be illegal to possess a sword, for the safety of the masses of course. I’m sure that YOU and your “crusader”<br />
friends plan on government agencies and police departments still having guns. Will secret service or<br />
county officers go home with guns or will they be locked up at headquarters. Will police departments be<br />
bound by law to “be there on time to prevent harm to citizens” be it at the hands of criminals or crazies<br />
armed with bats or steak knives . . . or guns or swords.<br />
	This debate can get ridiculous. History shows a world as or more brutal before guns. history<br />
shows many cases of very bad things happening to a population disarmed by a government. A woman (<br />
physically smaller person ) in America does not have to brutalized by a strong criminal or crazy. The reality<br />
is that there are two possibilities behind the reasoning of YOU and your crusader friends. 1 &#8211; you want to<br />
put your head in the sand and make the bad things stop. Good intentions &#8211; but unrealistic. I believe this is<br />
what drives Rep. McArthy.<br />
	After a hurricane and the bread and milk low or gone on the store shelves. In the middle of a five<br />
day blackout, my family was sitting on our front porch. A gang of 15 or so youths in there late teens and<br />
early twenties come walking down the road shining bright flashlights yelling “who’s there &#8211; are you OK?” It<br />
wasn’t comforting &#8211; it was intimidating &amp; meant to be so! Words were exchanged &#8211; you can’t appear weak &amp;<br />
intimidated like a potential victim at a time like this! My wife said that was scary, imagine there was a<br />
bigger problem than this.<br />
	I did have my legal .45 caliber pistol in my belt at the time, though nobody ever knew it. It never<br />
came out. It is my first and foremost responsibility to protect my family, home , &amp; self all the time. Not as an<br />
afterthought. Watch the news &#8211; there are people in this world who do horrific things. Not rarely, there is<br />
horror on the news every day. My legal AR-15 with legal 30 round magazines came out of lock-up for the<br />
duration of the blackout. After my wife said “that was scary” I told her “that is why we own this! Not for<br />
hunting or target shooting &#8211; situations like this!<br />
	I am an American citizen &#8211; I have the right  &#8211; in the bill of rights meant for the individual &#8211; to not<br />
only keep but to bear arms. I do not have to hope for a police car to arrive while my family is brutalized.<br />
There is no obligation to keep or bear arms, however those who do not, have no right to disarm those who<br />
do. It is not the purpose of a gun to slaughter innocent victims, however crazies &amp; criminals use it for such.<br />
Cars run people down, baseball bats smash peoples heads in, the same knife used to carve the turkey on<br />
thanksgiving can be used for ax-murder type slaughters &#8211; though it is not there true purpose. The gun may<br />
have more destructive power &#8211; but this is what gives it the ability to be used to protect the weak against the<br />
stronger or against superior numbers until the police do arrive.<br />
	Police can not be sued for not responding “in time”. Their duty is to investigate crimes, apprehend<br />
those responsible and and hold them so the courts can decide their punishment. YOU are responsible for<br />
your own protection. YOU can be as serious or aloof as YOU choose. YOU should scream for the police and<br />
courts to do a better job punishing the crazies and criminals &#8211; because THEY are the CRAZIES! In this world<br />
it is an easy case to be made that citizens who choose to protect themselves with firearms are the smart<br />
ones! Yet you try to portray these good family loving people as the crazies! That is insane and UN-<br />
American!!!<br />
	Gun rights are being infringed, illegally, in this country. True, to hunt you do not need a 30 round<br />
magazine. The reality is that after the hurricane, or refinery terrorist attack and resulting fuel shortage<br />
stopping truck deliveries, or any breakdown of normal life, the criminals &amp; crazies, the strong who bully, all<br />
become predators. And yes, band together. And at that point police get very busy. (A normal holiday<br />
weekend will be enough to put you on “hold” when you dial 911!!!) At that point response times could be too<br />
long to be of any help at all. You are on your own, and at that point a 30 round magazine is desirable,<br />
comforting &amp; yes needed. However it is now illegal to purchase anything over a 10 round magazine.<br />
Because a crazy criminal may break the law. ILLEGAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!!!  This<br />
brings us to reason number 2.<br />
	People in the government feel it is to their advantage to take away the ability of the people to<br />
stage an armed resistance! This line of thinking is UN-American. Like it or not, this line of thinking is in<br />
direct contrast to what the second amendment is truly about!!! A government of the people, by the<br />
people, for the people, would find their strength in a strong armed citizenry!!! A government of the people,<br />
by the people, for the people, would not find the “militia” part of the second amendment threatening.<br />
Looters would have a tough time if armed neighbors came together on each block to prevent lawlessness!<br />
It could be like a “well regulated militia” to keep the law, or at least prevent atrocities, when the police are<br />
overwhelmed. It’s a far better scenario than a disarmed public at the mercy of predators. A strong<br />
government of the people, by the people, for the people, is comforted by an armed, patriotic, strong<br />
citizenry. If a government fears an armed population they are probably heading in a direction of feeling the<br />
need to be able to control a population while following an agenda the people do not like. Perhaps in a<br />
direction thats good for the people even though they don’t think so, or don’t know any better and wether<br />
they like it or not because they have no recourse and we have nothing to fear from a disarmed population<br />
anyway, and besides, it’s for their own good! Doesn’t sound like America!<br />
	It is your right to decide against bearing arms, though I find your decision foolish. Don’t think<br />
good people should be forced to give up their ability to protect their family because you have the delusion<br />
of making the world safer after a criminal commits a horrible act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Triclosan: Coming Soon to a Store Near&#8230;. Oh Wait, it’s already here. by Dane Schonert</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/triclosan-coming-soon-to-a-store-near-oh-wait-it%e2%80%99s-already-here/comment-page-1/#comment-44501</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane Schonert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/triclosan-coming-soon-to-a-store-near-oh-wait-it%e2%80%99s-already-here/#comment-44501</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see someone else who thinks like I do. With so much ignorance in the world these days it&#039;s nice to know there&#039;s someone out there who isn&#039;t an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see someone else who thinks like I do. With so much ignorance in the world these days it&#8217;s nice to know there&#8217;s someone out there who isn&#8217;t an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Newt Gingrich Will Never Be President by Newt Gingrich Will Never Be President &#124; Certain Doubt &#171; Feeds &#171; Newt Gingrich For President- News Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/newt-gingrich-will-never-be-president/comment-page-1/#comment-42051</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt Gingrich Will Never Be President &#124; Certain Doubt &#171; Feeds &#171; Newt Gingrich For President- News Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/newt-gingrich-will-never-be-president/#comment-42051</guid>
		<description>[...] From News Source : http://www.certaindoubt.net/newt-gingrich-will-never-be-president/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From News Source : <a href="http://www.certaindoubt.net/newt-gingrich-will-never-be-president/" rel="nofollow">http://www.certaindoubt.net/newt-gingrich-will-never-be-president/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics and The War on Terror. by Randell Guerrier</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/ethics-and-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-27262</link>
		<dc:creator>Randell Guerrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singledoubt.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/ethics-and-the-war-on-terror/#comment-27262</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re Bill Gates, you&#039;d make billions.  This has nothing to do with his software or web-based knowledge.  Marketing (and monopoly) is his niche.  He could sell ice to Eskimos and has become the wealthiest person in the world simply by P.T. Barnum&#039;s rule of thumb:  &quot;There&#039;s a fool born every minute.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re Bill Gates, you&#8217;d make billions.  This has nothing to do with his software or web-based knowledge.  Marketing (and monopoly) is his niche.  He could sell ice to Eskimos and has become the wealthiest person in the world simply by P.T. Barnum&#8217;s rule of thumb:  &#8220;There&#8217;s a fool born every minute.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Check Your Glock at the Door by ANDRES CISNEROS</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/check-your-glock-at-the-door/comment-page-1/#comment-26848</link>
		<dc:creator>ANDRES CISNEROS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/check-your-glock-at-the-door/#comment-26848</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Crazy people with guns, are the cut final. I think, only intelligent minds, can stop this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Crazy people with guns, are the cut final. I think, only intelligent minds, can stop this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feeling Secure Yet? by Noma Haigler</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/feeling-secure-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-26596</link>
		<dc:creator>Noma Haigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/feeling-secure-yet/#comment-26596</guid>
		<description>Hey there, I can&#039;t understand how to add your website in my rss reader. Can you Aid me, please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, I can&#8217;t understand how to add your website in my rss reader. Can you Aid me, please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Afghanistan: the Myth of Truth by beatsbydre</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/afghanistan-the-myth-of-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-26577</link>
		<dc:creator>beatsbydre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/afghanistan-the-myth-of-truth/#comment-26577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading your news  for some time now and lastly got the bravery to go ahead and provide you with a shout out from Huffman Texas! Just wanted to tell you maintain up the amazing job!Nice posting! I will keep listening to the news.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bebeatsbydre.com/lady-gaga-heartbeats-c-26.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lady gaga heartbeats&lt;/a&gt;I like that there?I&#039;s a keep a copy method of an elastic wire and magnets holding the pin mechanism in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading your news  for some time now and lastly got the bravery to go ahead and provide you with a shout out from Huffman Texas! Just wanted to tell you maintain up the amazing job!Nice posting! I will keep listening to the news.<a href="http://www.bebeatsbydre.com/lady-gaga-heartbeats-c-26.html" rel="nofollow">lady gaga heartbeats</a>I like that there?I&#8217;s a keep a copy method of an elastic wire and magnets holding the pin mechanism in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Green Republican by Thomas Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/the-green-republican/comment-page-1/#comment-26353</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/the-green-republican/#comment-26353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve decided that all the republican candidates for president are really cartoon characters.

Stay tuned for more to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided that all the republican candidates for president are really cartoon characters.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for more to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More, More, Drone War by OsamaDead</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/more-more-drone-war/comment-page-1/#comment-22631</link>
		<dc:creator>OsamaDead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 05:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.certaindoubt.net/more-more-drone-war/#comment-22631</guid>
		<description>Drones work, but the collateral damage and innocents killed make it not worth it to me. I&#039;m all for small operation tactical team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drones work, but the collateral damage and innocents killed make it not worth it to me. I&#8217;m all for small operation tactical team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Craps Anyone? by Cecelia Seider</title>
		<link>http://www.certaindoubt.net/craps-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-21427</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecelia Seider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 16:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singledoubt.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/craps-anyone/#comment-21427</guid>
		<description>This was actually an attention-grabbing subject, I am very fortunate to have the ability to come to your blog and I&#039;ll bookmark this web page in order that I could come back another time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was actually an attention-grabbing subject, I am very fortunate to have the ability to come to your blog and I&#8217;ll bookmark this web page in order that I could come back another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

